Stage W0: private living prototype12 of 30 manuscripts drafted, 0 reviewed; 50 lexicon entries in draftWhat each later stage would need to show

Lexicon · The human story of meaning

Lexicon entryDraftNX-C005

Controlled vocabulary

Fully specified name: Controlled vocabulary (concept)

A managed set of terms used consistently for a defined purpose.

Scope note
Definitions and scope notes explain intended meaning.
Synonyms
None recorded as true synonyms in this context.
Monograph
Controlled vocabularies (planned; brief only)
External mappings
None recorded. In W0 no mapping to SNOMED CT® or any external authority is asserted for this entry. A future mapping record will carry source system, identifier, version, relation type, evidence, author, confidence where meaningful, and review state.
Formal status
Editorial entry only. It is not part of any released ontology and a prose edit here changes no formal definition.

Draft. This entry is an unreviewed draft. Its sources have not been checked by a named person and no domain reviewer has approved it. Treat every claim as provisional.

Notes

A controlled vocabulary is a list of terms that someone maintains: each term has a definition, a scope note that says what it does and does not cover, usually an identifier, and a governance process that decides when terms are added, changed, or retired. "Controlled" means that users do not invent their own labels for the same thing; they pick from the list, and the list is versioned.

Physicians meet controlled vocabularies as pick lists in an electronic record and as the codes on a claim. Scientists meet them as the terms a database requires for annotation. Radiochemists meet them in nomenclature rules and in the labels a regulator accepts. In each case the label alone is not the meaning; the definition and scope note are, and a vocabulary that ships labels without them is a source of silent disagreement.

A controlled vocabulary is narrower than an Ontology, which also states relationships and may support reasoning, and narrower than a Thesaurus, which records relationships among terms for retrieval. It is the foundation both of them rest on. The FHIR Code system resource is one standard way of describing such a vocabulary for exchange.